<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Texas Today &#187; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://texastoday.org/category/issues/gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://texastoday.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/<creativeCommons:license></creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Married to the State</title>
		<link>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/12/married-to-the-state/</link>
		<comments>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/12/married-to-the-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texastoday.org/2006/12/12/married-to-the-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homosexual Marriage vs. Heterosexual Marriage.

As a Christian Constitutionalist this, at first glance, may seem like quite a quagmire. The solution, as I see it, is actually quite simple. As a young Christian my reflexive response used to be the montra of many people who call themselves Christians, "the sanctity of marriage, between a man and a woman, MUST be preserved as an institution of God." Indeed, as a Christian, I know it is a sacred unity between a man and a woman instituted by God. However, under our great Constitution, this is NOT a behavior to be legislated and enforced by government. The Constitution and a number of historical facts, I believe, support my above determination.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/12/married-to-the-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage.</title>
		<link>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/04/gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/04/gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texastoday.org/2006/12/04/gay-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I&#8217;ve had it with this gay marriage debate.
Today, it seems, a Maryland court is hearing the latest argument for gay marriage—not that anything new&#8217;s being said.  Well, that&#8217;s fine, and to be expected.  What ticks me off in this case (as in all cases) is the language that the two sides use.
On [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://texastoday.org/2006/12/04/gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
